- From: Monica J. Martin <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>
- Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 08:27:19 -0800
- To: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
- Cc: "public-ws-policy@w3.org" <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
|hirsch: why is the following sentence in the proposal needed? |"Where a behavior is not engaged, the absence of policy expressions does not indicate anything about the |capabilities and requirements of a service." |Doesn't the previous sentence in the proposal (shown below here) make the point regarding the absence of a policy |assertion? |"When a policy assertion is absent, a policy aware client should not conclude anything (other than ‘no claims’) |about the absence of that policy assertion. " >>Monica comment: Frederick, We are attempting to differentiate policy assertion and expression, and the treatment thereof (granted more work may be needed and in the current sections, an optimal place to do so has proved a challenge). This could be shortened so folks understand the differences with: |"The absence of policy expressions does not indicate anything about the capabilities and requirements of a |service." One prime intent was to move this text up so it is understood where we talk about assertions and expressions (with a subtle reasoning to differentiate) given the preceding text in this section particularly the last sentence, reference: Like Contoso’s optional support for Optimized MIME Serialization, there are behaviors that may be engaged (in contrast to must be engaged) for a Web service interaction. A service provider will not fault if these behaviors are not engaged. Policy assertions can be marked optional to represent behaviors that may be engaged for an interaction. A policy assertion is marked as optional using the |wsp:Optional| attribute. Optional assertions represent the capabilities of the service provider as opposed to the requirements of the service provider. Thanks. ======== On Feb 6, 2007, at 7:41 PM, ext Monica J. Martin wrote: > Updated proposal 6 February 2007 for Issue 4288 and to close Action > 217. Combined proposal from MaryAnn Hondo, Fabian Ritzmann and Monica > J. Martin. > Reference: Primer, > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy- > primer.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8 > Action Item 217: http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/ > actions/217 > Issue: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4288 > > See attached the proposed changes to the Primer document [referenced > above] with redlines/tracked changes shown. The changes are captured > in either .htm or .pdf in a .zip (renamed to .zzz). Please change the > .zzz suffix to .zip to open. > > Thank you.* <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4288>* > <ws-policy-issue4288-action217-update-020607.zzz>
Received on Wednesday, 7 February 2007 16:27:37 UTC