W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy@w3.org > February 2007

Re: [Issue 4288 PRIMER] Updated Primer Proposal for Action 217 and Issue 4288

From: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 10:47:29 -0500
Message-Id: <6557ECC2-BAAE-41CF-A153-A09130D935D9@nokia.com>
Cc: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, "public-ws-policy@w3.org" <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
To: "ext Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>


why is the following sentence in the proposal needed?

"Where a behavior is not engaged, the absence of policy expressions  
does not indicate anything about the capabilities and requirements of  
a service."

Doesn't the previous sentence in the proposal (shown below here) make  
the point regarding the absence of a policy assertion?

  "When a policy assertion is absent, a policy aware client should  
not conclude anything (other than ‘no claims’) about the absence of  
that policy assertion. "

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch

On Feb 6, 2007, at 7:41 PM, ext Monica J. Martin wrote:

> Updated proposal 6 February 2007 for Issue 4288 and to close Action  
> 217. Combined proposal from MaryAnn Hondo, Fabian Ritzmann and  
> Monica J. Martin.
>    Reference: Primer,
>    http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy- 
> primer.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8
>    Action Item 217: http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/ 
> actions/217
>    Issue: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4288
> See attached the proposed changes to the Primer document  
> [referenced above] with redlines/tracked changes shown. The changes  
> are captured in either .htm or .pdf in a .zip (renamed to .zzz).  
> Please change the .zzz suffix to .zip to open.
> Thank you.* <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4288>*
> <ws-policy-issue4288-action217-update-020607.zzz>
Received on Wednesday, 7 February 2007 15:47:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:33:25 UTC