Hi > I agree if these assertions only have a meaning to the entity to which a > policy is attached. But you might e.g. have service brokers that > understand only those assertions that are necessary for their operation, > while the actual services and clients have a richer vocabulary. Or you > might have service assertions that are proprietary to a vendor and only > have a meaning for the web service clients from that vendor. This sounds like a good example to me, especially the first one where stripping such service server-only assertions may not work... For the second example I think existing policy alternatives will work... Cheers, Sergey > > Fabian >Received on Tuesday, 17 October 2006 12:25:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:33:16 UTC