Re: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721


> I agree if these assertions only have a meaning to the entity to which a 
> policy is attached. But you might e.g. have service brokers that 
> understand only those assertions that are necessary for their operation, 
> while the actual services and clients have a richer vocabulary. Or you 
> might have service assertions that are proprietary to a vendor and only 
> have a meaning for the web service clients from that vendor.

This sounds like a good example to me, especially the first one where stripping such service server-only assertions may not work...
For the second example I think existing policy alternatives will work...

Cheers, Sergey

> Fabian

Received on Tuesday, 17 October 2006 12:25:12 UTC