Re: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requeste from Sergey Beryozkin on 2006-10-17 (public-ws-policy@w3.org from October 2006)

From: Sergey Beryozkin <sergey.beryozkin@iona.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 13:19:42 +0100
To: "Fabian Ritzmann" <Fabian.Ritzmann@Sun.COM>
Cc: <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
Message-ID: <025101c6f1e6$865ef520$3901020a@sberyoz>

Hi Fabian

> Do you have a pointer to a document defining that assertion?
Sorry, I should use a different prefix :-) I used 'oasis' to add more credibility to my example :-)
It's just an example, no well-known policy like this exists at the moment

> I'm not clear why you are saying that this assertion would not have a 
> behavioral requirement on the provider. Doesn't the provider need to 
> fulfill some constraints in order to be replicable?

It was a typo....I meant a 'requester'

Thanks, Sergey

Received on Tuesday, 17 October 2006 12:18:33 UTC