Re: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requeste

Hi Fabian

> Do you have a pointer to a document defining that assertion?
Sorry, I should use a different prefix :-) I used 'oasis' to add more credibility to my example :-)
It's just an example, no well-known policy like this exists at the moment

> I'm not clear why you are saying that this assertion would not have a 
> behavioral requirement on the provider. Doesn't the provider need to 
> fulfill some constraints in order to be replicable?

It was a typo....I meant a 'requester'

Thanks, Sergey