W3C home
Mailing lists
Public
public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org
public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org from December 2006
by thread
35 messages
:
Starting
Tuesday, 5 December 2006 13:35:29 UTC,
Ending
Thursday, 21 December 2006 20:49:04 UTC
Sort by
:
thread
author
date
subject
Mail actions
:
mail a new topic
Help
:
how to use the archives
search the archives
[Bug 3953] Remove language that use of security policy assertions forces nested assertions for other domains
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 21 December)
[Bug 4069] Updating References for Use of xml:id
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Wednesday, 20 December)
[Bug 4069] Updating References for Use of xml:id
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Wednesday, 20 December)
[Bug 3984] [Guidelines] Assertion Parameters vs. Name Value Pairs
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Wednesday, 20 December)
[Bug 3983] [Guidelines] Use 'Assertion Author (s)' Consistently
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Wednesday, 20 December)
[Bug 3980] [Guidelines] Should Assume Basic Understanding of WS-Policy
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Wednesday, 20 December)
[Bug 4103] Questionable use of fictitious corp. name "Contoso Ltd."
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Wednesday, 20 December)
[Bug 3953] Remove language that use of security policy assertions forces nested assertions for other domains
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Tuesday, 19 December)
[Bug 4074] [Guidelines] Collection of unclear Guidance or text issues
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Monday, 18 December)
[Bug 4038] Nested policy in normal form - Example does not match expectations
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 14 December)
[Bug 4068] XML Schema does not allow for validating xml:id in policy documents
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Wednesday, 13 December)
[Bug 4039] WS-Policy does not define its relationship to XML Base
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Wednesday, 13 December)
[Bug 4038] Nested policy in normal form - Example does not match expectations
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Wednesday, 13 December)
[Bug 4074] [Guidelines] Collection of unclear Guidance or text issues
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Tuesday, 12 December)
[Bug 4073] [Guidelines] Free standing statements
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Tuesday, 12 December)
[Bug 4072] [Guidance] Statements not relevant to assertion design
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Tuesday, 12 December)
[Bug 4069] Updating References for Use of xml:id
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Monday, 11 December)
[Bug 4069] Updating References for Use of xml:id
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Monday, 11 December)
[Bug 4068] XML Schema does not allow for validating xml:id in policy documents
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Monday, 11 December)
[Bug 3560] The framework specification should also enable the usage of xml:id
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Monday, 11 December)
[Bug 4045] scoping of wsdl1.1 identifiers spec
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Friday, 8 December)
[Bug 3982] [Guidelines] The introduction should state that the document only targets policy assertion authors
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 7 December)
[Bug 4039] WS-Policy does not define its relationship to XML Base
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 7 December)
[Bug 4042] Editorial fix to Media type description
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Wednesday, 6 December)
[Bug 4042] Editorial fix to Media type description
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Wednesday, 6 December)
[Bug 3965] Clarify text surrounding PolicyReference and for usage of wsp:Name attribute
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Wednesday, 6 December)
[Bug 3952] Change optional example from MTOM to security (Guidelines and Primer)
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Wednesday, 6 December)
[Bug 4041] Update primer to mention ignorable as needed
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Wednesday, 6 December)
[Bug 4040] Update guidelines to include discussion of ignorable
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Wednesday, 6 December)
[Bug 4038] Nested policy in normal form - Example does not match expectations
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Wednesday, 6 December)
[Bug 4039] WS-Policy does not define its relationship to XML Base
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Wednesday, 6 December)
[Bug 4038] Nested policy in normal form - Example does not match expectations
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Wednesday, 6 December)
[Bug 3965] Clarify text surrounding PolicyReference and for usage of wsp:Name attribute
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Tuesday, 5 December)
[Bug 3953] Remove language that use of security policy assertions forces nested assertions for other domains
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Tuesday, 5 December)
[Bug 4035] Guidelines Section 2 should account for impact of assertions that do not manifest on the wire, or only apply to one party but may still impact the ability to interoperate, depending on whether they may be ignored.
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Tuesday, 5 December)
Last message date
: Thursday, 21 December 2006 20:49:04 UTC