Thursday, 21 December 2006
Wednesday, 20 December 2006
- [Bug 4069] Updating References for Use of xml:id
- [Bug 4069] Updating References for Use of xml:id
- [Bug 3984] [Guidelines] Assertion Parameters vs. Name Value Pairs
- [Bug 3983] [Guidelines] Use 'Assertion Author (s)' Consistently
- [Bug 3980] [Guidelines] Should Assume Basic Understanding of WS-Policy
- [Bug 4103] Questionable use of fictitious corp. name "Contoso Ltd."
Tuesday, 19 December 2006
Monday, 18 December 2006
Thursday, 14 December 2006
Wednesday, 13 December 2006
- [Bug 4068] XML Schema does not allow for validating xml:id in policy documents
- [Bug 4039] WS-Policy does not define its relationship to XML Base
- [Bug 4038] Nested policy in normal form - Example does not match expectations
Tuesday, 12 December 2006
- [Bug 4074] [Guidelines] Collection of unclear Guidance or text issues
- [Bug 4073] [Guidelines] Free standing statements
- [Bug 4072] [Guidance] Statements not relevant to assertion design
Monday, 11 December 2006
- [Bug 4069] Updating References for Use of xml:id
- [Bug 4069] Updating References for Use of xml:id
- [Bug 4068] XML Schema does not allow for validating xml:id in policy documents
- [Bug 3560] The framework specification should also enable the usage of xml:id
Friday, 8 December 2006
Thursday, 7 December 2006
- [Bug 3982] [Guidelines] The introduction should state that the document only targets policy assertion authors
- [Bug 4039] WS-Policy does not define its relationship to XML Base
Wednesday, 6 December 2006
- [Bug 4042] Editorial fix to Media type description
- [Bug 4042] Editorial fix to Media type description
- [Bug 3965] Clarify text surrounding PolicyReference and for usage of wsp:Name attribute
- [Bug 3952] Change optional example from MTOM to security (Guidelines and Primer)
- [Bug 4041] Update primer to mention ignorable as needed
- [Bug 4040] Update guidelines to include discussion of ignorable
- [Bug 4038] Nested policy in normal form - Example does not match expectations
- [Bug 4039] WS-Policy does not define its relationship to XML Base
- [Bug 4038] Nested policy in normal form - Example does not match expectations
Tuesday, 5 December 2006
- [Bug 3965] Clarify text surrounding PolicyReference and for usage of wsp:Name attribute
- [Bug 3953] Remove language that use of security policy assertions forces nested assertions for other domains
- [Bug 4035] Guidelines Section 2 should account for impact of assertions that do not manifest on the wire, or only apply to one party but may still impact the ability to interoperate, depending on whether they may be ignored.