- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:39:05 +0000
- To: public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4068
Summary: XML Schema does not allow for validating xml:id in
policy documents
Product: WS-Policy
Version: LC
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Framework+Attachment
AssignedTo: fsasaki@w3.org
ReportedBy: fsasaki@w3.org
QAContact: public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org
BugsThisDependsOn: 3560
Title: XML Schema does not allow for validating xml:id in policy documents
Description: The XML Schema document for the WS-Policy LC WD is not yet
updated. The reason is that the latest revision
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy.xsd?rev=1.6
has a problem with the schema update for the resolution for
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3560 (enable the usage of
xml:id):
If you use xml:id at the <Policy> element in an instance with the
current schema, you will get an error. You can't use xml:id, typed as an
ID, on an element which has an ID attribute (like wsu:Id) specifically
declared for it.
Justification: Validation of a policy document against the policy schema should
be possible also if xml:id is used.
Target: XML Schema document, with a reference to its latest and dated version
from the XML Schema namespace document at http://www.w3.org/2006/07/ws-policy
Proposal: There are three solutions for the problem:
a) publish two flavors of the schema, one with xml:id, one with wsu:Id
b) declare two subtypes which are accessible via xsi:type:
<Policy ... xsi:type="xid-flavor" xml:id="boo" ...> versus <Policy ...
xsi:type="wsu-flavor" wsu:id="boo" ...>
c) delete the explicit reference to <xs:attribute ref="wsu:Id"/> .
This would make both xml:id and wsu:Id extensibility points.
I have a high preference for c), including a note in the WD to warn
schema users (don't use other ID attributes than these two), to avoid
the confusion created by deleting the explicit reference to
<xs:attribute ref="wsu:Id"/>.
I have not opened an issue on this and not reopened 3560, since the
normative text has precedence over the schema anyway.
See the discussion thread at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0029.html
Received on Monday, 11 December 2006 14:39:28 UTC