- From: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 08:51:06 -0400
- To: "Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- Cc: public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org, public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org
Received on Friday, 21 July 2006 12:51:35 UTC
+1 Christopher Ferris STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog.jspa?blog=440 phone: +1 508 377 9295 public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org wrote on 07/19/2006 10:43:52 AM: > > Other standards committees will want to reference directly into the > WS-Policy specs at the section level. In fact this request was made on > the OASIS WS-EX TC call today that I attended. > > Can the editors confirm that the current documents will have stable > fragment ids across different WDs at the section level? > > It appears that the current Editor's documents in CVS use "meaningful" > fragment ids at the section, sub-section and sub-sub-section levels. I > think my request can be simply satisfied by the Editor's not making > gratuitous changes to these fragment ids. > > /paulc > > Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada > 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 > Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 > mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com > > > > > >
Received on Friday, 21 July 2006 12:51:35 UTC