- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 13:32:26 -0700
- To: "Hugo Haas" <hugo@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
Thanks for your comment. The WS Description Working Group tracked this as a Last Call comment LC303 [1]. The Working Group agreed to fix the problem by adopting the proposal at [2] along with the amendments at [3]. If we don't hear otherwise within two weeks, we will assume this satisfies your concern. [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/issues.html#LC303 [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0030.html [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0030.html > -----Original Message----- > From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc- > comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Hugo Haas > Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 6:46 AM > To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > Subject: Mention IRIs in the primer > > Comment about: > > Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 0: Primer > http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-wsdl20-primer-20050803/ > > The primer talks exclusively about URIs. It should talk about IRIs > some. The primer is probably a good place to mention that for > internationalization purposes, WSDL 2.0 supports IRIs which are a > superset of URIs. > > It might be useful to point to An Introduction to Multilingual Web > Addresses[1] which explains what IRIs are, how they differ from URIs, > why they exist, etc. > > Cheers, > > Hugo > > 1. http://www.w3.org/International/articles/idn-and-iri/ > -- > Hugo Haas - W3C > mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2005 20:38:24 UTC