- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 13:36:10 -0700
- To: "Hugo Haas" <hugo@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
Thanks for your comment. The WS Description Working Group tracked this as a Last Call comment LC321 [1]. The Working Group agreed to fix the problem by adopting the proposal at [2]. If we don't hear otherwise within two weeks, we will assume this satisfies your concern. [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/issues.html#LC321 [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0011.html > -----Original Message----- > From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc- > comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Hugo Haas > Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 3:13 AM > To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > Subject: SOAP binding: clarify that the lack {soap mep} value is an > error > > In Table 5-4. Mapping from XML Representation to SOAP Operation > Component Properties from 5.8.4 Mapping from XML Representation to > Component Properties in Part 2, we say: > > > > > Property Value > > > > > The actual value of the wsoap:mep attribute > > information item, if present. If not, the actual > > value of the wsoap:mepDefault attribute > information > {soap mep} item of the parent wsdl:binding element > information > item, if present. If not the value as defined by > the > default SOAP binding rules (for SOAP 1.2, see > 5.11.3 > Default Binding Rules), if applicable. > > > > > > We should add "Otherwise an error" to clarify that it's not OK for > {soap mep} not to have a value. > > -- > Hugo Haas - W3C > mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2005 20:37:08 UTC