RE: Typos

It does. Thanks.

 

________________________________

From: Jonathan Marsh 
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 12:37 PM
To: Jonathan Marsh; Marc Goodner
Cc: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
Subject: RE: Typos

 

 

Thanks for your comment.  The WS Description Working Group tracked this
as a Last Call comment LC342 [1].  We accepted your suggestions for
improvements, including fixing section 5.9.1 (now 5.8.1) with the
proposed text at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0052.html.

 

If we don't hear otherwise within two weeks, we will assume this
satisfies your concern.

 

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/issues.html#LC342

 

 

________________________________

From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan
Marsh
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 7:37 AM
To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
Cc: Marc Goodner
Subject: Typos

 

A few typos courtesy of Marc:

 

Section 2, first paragraph after note: "define the sequence and of
abstract messages" should be "define the sequence of abstract messages"

 

Section 5.10.1: "ond" should be "and"

 

Section 5.11.2:

"extension of the 5." should be either "extension of 5." or "extension
of section 5."

"patterns defined in 2." should be "patterns defined in section 2" 

"patterns defined in 6." should be "patterns defined in section 6.6" 

 

Section 5.9.1: "it is permissible for specification interaction to
engage" is very strange wording. I don't really have an alternative but
wanted to call attention to it.

 

Section 6.3 first note after table 6-1: "stype" should be "type"

 

 

--  Jonathan Marsh  --  jmarsh@microsoft.com
<mailto:jmarsh@microsoft.com>   --
http://spaces.msn.com/members/auburnmarshes/
<http://spaces.msn.com/members/auburnmarshes/>   --