RE: Typos


Thanks for your comment.  The WS Description Working Group tracked this
as a Last Call comment LC342 [1].  We accepted your suggestions for
improvements, including fixing section 5.9.1 (now 5.8.1) with the
proposed text at


If we don't hear otherwise within two weeks, we will assume this
satisfies your concern.






[] On Behalf Of Jonathan
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 7:37 AM
Cc: Marc Goodner
Subject: Typos


A few typos courtesy of Marc:


Section 2, first paragraph after note: "define the sequence and of
abstract messages" should be "define the sequence of abstract messages"


Section 5.10.1: "ond" should be "and"


Section 5.11.2:

"extension of the 5." should be either "extension of 5." or "extension
of section 5."

"patterns defined in 2." should be "patterns defined in section 2" 

"patterns defined in 6." should be "patterns defined in section 6.6" 


Section 5.9.1: "it is permissible for specification interaction to
engage" is very strange wording. I don't really have an alternative but
wanted to call attention to it.


Section 6.3 first note after table 6-1: "stype" should be "type"



--  Jonathan Marsh  --
<>   --
<>   --


Received on Thursday, 3 November 2005 20:36:54 UTC