- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 11:21:33 -0700
- To: "Asir Vedamuthu" <asirv@webmethods.com>, <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
- Cc: "Christopher St. John" <cks@webmethods.com>
Thanks for your comment. The Working Group decided to drop this sentence as you suggest. [See http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC16] If you don't respond by October 1, we'll assume you accept this resolution. > -----Original Message----- > From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc- > comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Asir Vedamuthu > Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 6:36 PM > To: 'public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org' > Cc: Christopher St. John > Subject: Interface = design of the application ?? > > > I am writing this issue on behalf of Christopher St. John, webMethods. > > ref: http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-wsdl20-20040803/#Interface_details > > "2.2.1 The Interface Component > > An Interface component describes sequences of messages that a service > sends > and/or receives. It does this by grouping related messages into > operations. > An operation is a sequence of input and output messages, and an interface > is > a set of operations. Thus, an interface defines the design of the > application." > > This paragraph defines the design of the application. It appears that this > para is moving too fast. It provides some evidence. But, its conclusion - > "Thus, .." - does not carry sufficient evidence. Then again, WSDL does > not > have to say anything about the design of the application. Perhaps, the > design of an interface. We suggest getting rid of the last sentence. > > Regards, > Asir S Vedamuthu > asirv at webmethods dot com > http://www.webmethods.com/
Received on Tuesday, 21 September 2004 18:22:00 UTC