- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 11:21:31 -0700
- To: "Asir Vedamuthu" <asirv@webmethods.com>, <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
Thanks for your comment. The Working Group decided to drop the use of
the undefined term "HTTP Operation Component" and will make it clear
that we're talking about a Binding Operation Component augmented by
properties from the HTTP binding.
[See http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC13]
If you don't respond by October 1, we'll assume you accept this
resolution.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc-
> comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Asir Vedamuthu
> Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 6:04 PM
> To: 'public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org'
> Subject: HTTP Operation Component ?
>
>
> ref:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-wsdl20-bindings-20040803/#http-operation-
> decl-x
> ml
>
> Actually, there isn't anything close to HTTP Operation Component in
Part
> 3.
> I found 5 occurrences of the phrase "HTTP Operation Component". These
are
> just remains from the old text.
>
> AFAIK, there is a binding operation component. And, HTTP binding adds
a
> set
> of properties - {http location}, {http method}, {http input
> serialization},
> {http output serialization}, {http fault serialization}- to this
binding
> operation component.
>
> Regards,
> Asir S Vedamuthu
> asirv at webmethods dot com
> http://www.webmethods.com/
Received on Tuesday, 21 September 2004 18:21:59 UTC