- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 11:42:27 -0700
- To: "Asir Vedamuthu" <asirv@webmethods.com>, <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
Thanks for your comment. The Working Group decided to fix this mismatch
by saying that the value is the component, and fixing the mapping
accordingly.
[See http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC14]
If you don't respond by October 1, we'll assume you accept this
resolution.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc-
> comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Asir Vedamuthu
> Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 6:11 PM
> To: 'public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org'
> Subject: Mapping ref attribute to {fault reference} - Type Mismatch
>
>
> ref:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-wsdl20-20040803/#FaultReference_Mapping
>
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-wsdl20-20040803/#FaultReference_details
>
> Mapping,
> "{fault reference} = The actual value of the ref attribute information
> item"
>
> Component description,
> "{fault reference} REQUIRED. An Interface Fault component in the
{faults}
> property of the parent Interface Operation component's parent
Interface
> component. Identifying the Interface Fault component therefore
indirectly
> defines the actual content or payload of the fault message."
>
> Actual value is a QName. But, {fault reference} is a component. Hence,
the
> mismatch.
>
> Regards,
> Asir S Vedamuthu
> asirv at webmethods dot com
> http://www.webmethods.com/
Received on Tuesday, 21 September 2004 18:43:02 UTC