RE: HTTP Operation Component ?

Thank you for considering my request.

Asir

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Marsh [mailto:jmarsh@microsoft.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 2:22 PM
To: Asir Vedamuthu; public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
Subject: RE: HTTP Operation Component ?


Thanks for your comment.  The Working Group decided to drop the use of
the undefined term "HTTP Operation Component" and will make it clear
that we're talking about a Binding Operation Component augmented by
properties from the HTTP binding.

[See http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC13]

If you don't respond by October 1, we'll assume you accept this
resolution.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc-
> comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Asir Vedamuthu
> Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 6:04 PM
> To: 'public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org'
> Subject: HTTP Operation Component ?
> 
> 
> ref:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-wsdl20-bindings-20040803/#http-operation-
> decl-x
> ml
> 
> Actually, there isn't anything close to HTTP Operation Component in
Part
> 3.
> I found 5 occurrences of the phrase "HTTP Operation Component". These
are
> just remains from the old text.
> 
> AFAIK, there is a binding operation component. And, HTTP binding adds
a
> set
> of properties - {http location}, {http method}, {http input
> serialization},
> {http output serialization}, {http fault serialization}- to this
binding
> operation component.
> 
> Regards,
> Asir S Vedamuthu
> asirv at webmethods dot com
> http://www.webmethods.com/

Received on Tuesday, 28 September 2004 19:30:42 UTC