- From: Martin Chapman <martin.chapman@oracle.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 15:17:16 -0700
- To: <jdart@tibco.com>, "Jean-Jacques Dubray" <jjd@eigner.com>
- Cc: "'Assaf Arkin'" <arkin@intalio.com>, "'Champion Mike'" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>, <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
surely the crux of the matter is whether a choreo langauge needs different constructs for internal and external defintions. If there are no differences in constructs required, it is a design choice as to what one exposes. Can we think of any any constructs that are required in one but not the other? Martin. > -----Original Message----- > From: public-ws-chor-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-ws-chor-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Jon Dart > Sent: Monday, May 05, 2003 1:20 PM > To: Jean-Jacques Dubray > Cc: 'Assaf Arkin'; 'Champion Mike'; public-ws-chor@w3.org > Subject: Re: internal vs external > > > > Jean-Jacques Dubray wrote: > > > IMHO, being able to define both public, and semi-private choreographies > > is a requirement. > > +1 > > However IMO it is also important to capture the use cases mentioned > here, as they help determine what degrees and kinds of privacy are needed. > > --Jon > > >
Received on Monday, 5 May 2003 18:18:33 UTC