- From: Jon Dart <jdart@tibco.com>
- Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 16:28:08 -0700
- To: Martin Chapman <martin.chapman@oracle.com>
- CC: Jean-Jacques Dubray <jjd@eigner.com>, "'Assaf Arkin'" <arkin@intalio.com>, "'Champion Mike'" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>, public-ws-chor@w3.org
Martin Chapman wrote: > surely the crux of the matter is whether a choreo langauge needs different > constructs for internal and external defintions. If there are no > differences in constructs required, it is a design choice as to what one > exposes. Can we think of any any constructs that are required in one but not > the other? BPEL 1.1 has a core language plus "Extensions for Executable Processes" and "Extensions for Business Protocols". So they actually have some overlap (the core stuff) but there is stuff that only applies to the descriptive (external) view and stuff that only applies to the executable (internal) view. It appears that the overlap area is the bulk of the spec, however. --Jon
Received on Monday, 5 May 2003 19:28:16 UTC