- From: Fletcher, Tony <Tony.Fletcher@choreology.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 11:43:18 +0100
- To: "Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com>, "Steve Ross-Talbot" <steve@enigmatec.net>, "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
+1 from Tony Best Regards Tony A M Fletcher Cohesions (TM) Business transaction management software for application coordination www.choreology.com Choreology Ltd., 13 Austin Friars, London EC2N 2JX UK Tel: +44 (0) 20 76701787 Fax: +44 (0) 20 7670 1785 Mobile: +44 (0) 7801 948219 tony.fletcher@choreology.com (Home: amfletcher@iee.org) -----Original Message----- From: public-ws-chor-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-chor-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Martin Chapman Sent: 17 July 2003 17:17 To: Steve Ross-Talbot; Champion, Mike Cc: public-ws-chor@w3.org Subject: RE: Grounding Choreographies (the atoms) - WAS Simple Choreography composition suggestion I think there is a fundamental terminology issue here that needs to be cleared up. An entity (avoiding any overloaded word) that sends a message to a web service (and may expect a response depending on the wsdl) doesn not iteslf have to be a web service. This is the most fundamental building block. Furthermore this interaction supports an MEP (in soap teminology) and pattern (in wsd teminology). Perosnllay if we can not describe these meps in a choreography language we have failed, and hence I do not think that mep choreogaprhy is any different from web service choreography. Martin.
Received on Friday, 18 July 2003 06:43:45 UTC