- From: Fletcher, Tony <Tony.Fletcher@choreology.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 12:22:08 +0100
- To: "Cummins, Fred A" <fred.cummins@eds.com>, "Andrew Berry" <andyb@whyanbeel.net>, <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
Dear Fred and others, See comments inserted below: Best Regards Tony A M Fletcher Cohesions (TM) Business transaction management software for application coordination www.choreology.com Choreology Ltd., 13 Austin Friars, London EC2N 2JX UK Tel: +44 (0) 20 76701787 Fax: +44 (0) 20 7670 1785 Mobile: +44 (0) 7801 948219 tony.fletcher@choreology.com (Home: amfletcher@iee.org) -----Original Message----- From: Cummins, Fred A [mailto:fred.cummins@eds.com] Sent: 17 July 2003 18:51 To: Fletcher, Tony; Andrew Berry; public-ws-chor@w3.org Subject: RE: Revised: Mission Statement Tony, I agree with you generally that contracts will be between two parties, but such contracts may also define obligations that affect relationships (e.g., contracts) with entities not party to the contract. Thus a seller may require that a buyer have an established line of credit with a financial institution and this might be confirmed by an exchange with the designated institution. <AMF> Accepted. As I understand it a contract will usually (maybe not always) be between two parties, but these contracts can certainly reference all sorts of 'external' things - how is that for precise legal language!!! </AMF> There will also be exchanges where there is no contract to start with and the exchange will develop an agreement, i.e., contract. Exchanges may also be governed by commercial standards or laws to which parties of an exchange subscribe or are subject to. The more difficult choreographies may be where there is no contract and parties want to establish a relationship in which the risk to each is minimized, e.g., I don't ship anything until I'm sure I know who your are and am assured that I will get paid. <AMF> I once thought like this too, but a lawyer in a different forum (UN/CEFACT actually) convinced me otherwise, certainly for any interaction that could be considered to be 'trade'. When ever you trade it seems you are always covered by law - International law if national laws do not override, national law if a specific contract does not come into play. So you are either covered by an explicit contract or an implicit one. </AMF> Fred
Received on Friday, 18 July 2003 07:22:19 UTC