RE: Implementing CR38 - new namespace

Given a namespace change has been decided, I suggest doing a full change
including the prefix and the namespace name to include updated
"metadata" and year/month.  In for a penny, in for a pound.

Dave 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of 
> David Illsley
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 7:13 AM
> To: Rogers, Tony
> Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org; public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Implementing CR38 - new namespace
> 
> 
> I'm in favour of 2 also.
> 
> Philippe pointed out that the prefix in the spec is unimportant (and I
> agree) but.. I think it'd be good to change it anyway for clarity.
> 
> David
> 
> David Illsley
> Web Services Development
> MP211, IBM Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
> +44 (0)1962 815049 (Int. 245049)
> david.illsley@uk.ibm.com
> 
> 
> 
> From:
> "Rogers, Tony" <Tony.Rogers@ca.com>
> To:
> <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
> Date:
> 01/03/2007 12:21 PM
> Subject:
> Implementing CR38 - new namespace
> 
> 
> In answer to CR38, we resolved that we would use a new 
> namespace in connection with the document formerly known as 
> the WSDL Binding (now the Metadata document), but we did not 
> resolve what that new namespace would be. I see two options:
>  
> 1.  we continue to use a namespace ending in wsdl, and simply 
> change the year and month
>  
> 2.  we change the suffix to metadata, as well as changing the 
> year and month
>  
> My inclination is option 2, but I am not opposed to option 1.
>  
> If we do the latter, would we want to change the namespace 
> prefix in the document from wsaw to wsam? That would involve 
> a great many changes, albeit small ones.
>  
> Tony Rogers
>  
> 
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 4 January 2007 18:55:46 UTC