- From: Bob Freund <bob@freunds.com>
- Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 15:30:24 -0500
- To: "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>, "David Illsley" <david.illsley@uk.ibm.com>, "Rogers, Tony" <Tony.Rogers@ca.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>, <public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org>
+1 -----Original Message----- From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Orchard Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 1:55 PM To: David Illsley; Rogers, Tony Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org; public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org Subject: RE: Implementing CR38 - new namespace Given a namespace change has been decided, I suggest doing a full change including the prefix and the namespace name to include updated "metadata" and year/month. In for a penny, in for a pound. Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of > David Illsley > Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 7:13 AM > To: Rogers, Tony > Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org; public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org > Subject: Re: Implementing CR38 - new namespace > > > I'm in favour of 2 also. > > Philippe pointed out that the prefix in the spec is unimportant (and I > agree) but.. I think it'd be good to change it anyway for clarity. > > David > > David Illsley > Web Services Development > MP211, IBM Hursley Park, SO21 2JN > +44 (0)1962 815049 (Int. 245049) > david.illsley@uk.ibm.com > > > > From: > "Rogers, Tony" <Tony.Rogers@ca.com> > To: > <public-ws-addressing@w3.org> > Date: > 01/03/2007 12:21 PM > Subject: > Implementing CR38 - new namespace > > > In answer to CR38, we resolved that we would use a new > namespace in connection with the document formerly known as > the WSDL Binding (now the Metadata document), but we did not > resolve what that new namespace would be. I see two options: > > 1. we continue to use a namespace ending in wsdl, and simply > change the year and month > > 2. we change the suffix to metadata, as well as changing the > year and month > > My inclination is option 2, but I am not opposed to option 1. > > If we do the latter, would we want to change the namespace > prefix in the document from wsaw to wsam? That would involve > a great many changes, albeit small ones. > > Tony Rogers > > > >
Received on Thursday, 4 January 2007 20:30:46 UTC