- From: David Illsley <david.illsley@uk.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 15:13:01 +0000
- To: "Rogers, Tony" <Tony.Rogers@ca.com>
- Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org, public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org
I'm in favour of 2 also. Philippe pointed out that the prefix in the spec is unimportant (and I agree) but.. I think it'd be good to change it anyway for clarity. David David Illsley Web Services Development MP211, IBM Hursley Park, SO21 2JN +44 (0)1962 815049 (Int. 245049) david.illsley@uk.ibm.com From: "Rogers, Tony" <Tony.Rogers@ca.com> To: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org> Date: 01/03/2007 12:21 PM Subject: Implementing CR38 - new namespace In answer to CR38, we resolved that we would use a new namespace in connection with the document formerly known as the WSDL Binding (now the Metadata document), but we did not resolve what that new namespace would be. I see two options: 1. we continue to use a namespace ending in wsdl, and simply change the year and month 2. we change the suffix to metadata, as well as changing the year and month My inclination is option 2, but I am not opposed to option 1. If we do the latter, would we want to change the namespace prefix in the document from wsaw to wsam? That would involve a great many changes, albeit small ones. Tony Rogers
Received on Thursday, 4 January 2007 15:13:11 UTC