- From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 17:46:23 -0000
- To: <distobj@acm.org>, <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Hi Mark, > Whatever the resolution, I hope that the need for additional > out-of-band agreement (other than what is defined in the SOAP & WSDL > specs) is documented as an interoperability problem. I'm unsure what OOB agreement is needed - the issue is that the same element 'echo' being used for the input and output, an endpoint acting as both the sender and receiver roles can only use Action to distinguish if the echo is a request or a response. In practice, an endpoint is unlikely be operating as both 'client' and 'server', 'publisher' and 'subscriber' etc. so changing the message body element to be also unique relaxes the requirement artificially placed upon implementations to process based upon wsa:Action rather than the message contents or even some combination of the two. As far as the sender is concerned, they only need to populate the wsa:Action and body fields as directed by the WSDL, EPR or whatever and all is well. Paul
Received on Tuesday, 3 January 2006 17:46:35 UTC