- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 09:53:51 -0500
- To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
That's interesting, in particular the "Same identity" "answer" (at the time the picture was taken, of course). I think the spec is quite clear that the identifying information is the URI and the RefProps. Nothing else is claimed to be an identifier AFAICT, nor does the spec seem to allow other specs to add other identifying information ... though it doesn't rule it out either, of course (but IMO that would be very bad practice, since I believe that identifiers should be self-descriptive within a message). So why isn't the answer to that "1,2,3"? What's the reasoning behind not immediately listing 1 as an answer? And similarly, why is #4 being considered at all? I'm curious about this, because I want to make sure I'm arguing to exclude the right things from the spec. If other stuff might impact what is identified, IMO it should be removed to. So answer *very* carefully. P-) 8-) Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca
Received on Thursday, 9 December 2004 14:51:21 UTC