- From: Harris Reynolds <hreynolds@webmethods.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 13:17:51 -0500
- To: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
- Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
This is easily done with the RelatesTo element content, but doesn't require the RelationshipType attribute. Right? The question is what is a use case for this attribute. Harris Reynolds webMethods, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: David Orchard [mailto:dorchard@bea.com] Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 1:08 PM To: Harris Reynolds; Martin Gudgin; Rich Salz Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org Subject: RE: i037: Replace QName's with anyURI Correlate between a request and a response done with 2 asych messages. Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-addressing- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Harris Reynolds > Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 9:48 AM > To: 'Martin Gudgin'; Rich Salz > Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org > Subject: RE: i037: Replace QName's with anyURI > > > This is related, but slightly off topic. Why do we need the relationship > type attribute in the first place? What use case does it satisfy? > > > Harris Reynolds > webMethods, Inc. > > -----Original Message----- > From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Martin Gudgin > Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 10:57 PM > To: Rich Salz; Harris Reynolds > Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org > Subject: RE: i037: Replace QName's with anyURI > > > Given that we have deal with "QNames in Content" anyway, what's the > motivation for moving from QName to URI for the @RelationshipType? > > Gudge > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org > > [mailto:public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Rich Salz > > Sent: 02 December 2004 19:49 > > To: Harris Reynolds > > Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org > > Subject: Re: i037: Replace QName's with anyURI > > > > > > I totally agree that we should not replace qname's with URI's > > when they > > come from the outside (e.g WSDL), but that we should use > > URI's for our own > > stuff. > > /r$ > > > > -- > > Rich Salz Chief Security Architect > > DataPower Technology http://www.datapower.com > > XS40 XML Security Gateway http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html > > XML Security Overview > > http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html > > > > > >
Received on Monday, 6 December 2004 18:19:01 UTC