- From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 18:28:47 -0000
- To: <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>, <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>
I'm looking into adding this new test when I noticed test1140 and test1146 already send the duplicateToRequest.xml message. So how are these tests different to your new one - I'd expect the example messages to be different!? Paul -----Original Message----- From: public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org on behalf of Glen Daniels Sent: Thu 3/16/2006 11:55 PM To: public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org Subject: New test Here's the test I was suggesting, in what I hope is the right format. Should we do both a SOAP 1.1 and a SOAP 1.2 version of this? --G <testcase xml:id="test1149" cr="REQUIRED"> <title>SOAP 1.1 two-way message with a duplicate To header and a ReplyTo of none.</title> <description><![CDATA[Two-way message exchange containing a duplicate To header and ReplyTo of none. An InvalidAddressingHeader fault should be generated, but not sent due to the ReplyTo header.]]></description> <features> <feature>soap08</feature> <feature>core10</feature> </features> <message-exchange type="SOAP11-HTTP-In-Out-Fault" addr-binding="soap11"> <message from="A" to="B" document="echo/soap11/duplicateToRequest.xml" name="message"> <assert test="count(soap11:Envelope/soap11:Header/wsa:To) = 2"/> <assert test="soap11:Envelope/soap11:Header/wsa:ReplyTo/wsa:Address = 'http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/none'"> <assert test="count(soap11:Envelope/soap11:Header/wsa:FaultTo) = 0"/> </message> <message from="B" to="A"/> </message-exchange> </testcase>
Received on Friday, 17 March 2006 18:36:36 UTC