- From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 18:28:47 -0000
- To: <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>, <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>
I'm looking into adding this new test when I noticed test1140
and test1146 already send the duplicateToRequest.xml message.
So how are these tests different to your new one - I'd expect
the example messages to be different!?
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org on behalf of Glen Daniels
Sent: Thu 3/16/2006 11:55 PM
To: public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org
Subject: New test
Here's the test I was suggesting, in what I hope is the right format.
Should we do both a SOAP 1.1 and a SOAP 1.2 version of this?
--G
<testcase xml:id="test1149"
cr="REQUIRED">
<title>SOAP 1.1 two-way message with a duplicate To header and a
ReplyTo of none.</title>
<description><![CDATA[Two-way message exchange containing a
duplicate To header and ReplyTo of none. An InvalidAddressingHeader
fault should be generated, but not sent due to the ReplyTo
header.]]></description>
<features>
<feature>soap08</feature>
<feature>core10</feature>
</features>
<message-exchange type="SOAP11-HTTP-In-Out-Fault"
addr-binding="soap11">
<message from="A" to="B"
document="echo/soap11/duplicateToRequest.xml" name="message">
<assert test="count(soap11:Envelope/soap11:Header/wsa:To) =
2"/>
<assert
test="soap11:Envelope/soap11:Header/wsa:ReplyTo/wsa:Address =
'http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/none'">
<assert test="count(soap11:Envelope/soap11:Header/wsa:FaultTo)
= 0"/>
</message>
<message from="B" to="A"/>
</message-exchange>
</testcase>
Received on Friday, 17 March 2006 18:36:36 UTC