- From: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 08:28:27 -0500
- To: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>
Hi Jonathan: > However, I don't think your assertions will be sufficient to > verify that no reply message is received. Perhaps adding the > kind of assertions found in 1236 and so forth... > > <assert > test="not(../following-sibling::log:message[@testcase=current( > )/../@testcase and @message!='1']) or > count(../following-sibling::log:message[@testcase=current()/.. > /@testcase and @message!='1']/log:content/*) = 0"/> +1 > Whether this message is really a two-message exchange as > described by SOAP11-HTTP-In-Out-Fault is perhaps a > philosophical question. Here I was just copying from 1140 and the other "faulty" tests. I'm totally agnostic on this one, and can probably think of topics I'd rather debate late at night over absinthe in smoky French cafes.... --Glen
Received on Friday, 17 March 2006 13:30:00 UTC