- From: Arun Gupta <Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM>
- Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 09:11:20 -0800
- To: David Illsley <david.illsley@uk.ibm.com>
- Cc: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, WS-Addressing Tests <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>, public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org
test1147 for IBM->Sun and Microsoft->Sun is now fixed and endpoints updated. I dont have an easy way to test1147 and test1248 for Sun->Sun. Can that be updated in the stylesheet to reflect that ? I sent a separate mail about test1251 and still looking for an explanation there before I implement it. -Arun David Illsley wrote: > > Looks better :-) > > ...but maybe not quite right (Microsoft -> Sun is failing 'cos of a lack > of a message 2 in 1251 and message 2 shouldn't be required for 1251). > > I think the following should fix it so that only message elements in the > testcases.xml which have associated assertions become required. > > In mkschema.xsl: > > <xsl:if test="$num!=1"> > <xsl:if > test="count(./s:assert)>0"> > > <sch:rule context="log:message[@testcase='{$testcase}'][@message='1']"> > > <sch:assert > test="following-sibling::log:message[@testcase='{$testcase}'][@message='{$num}']">assertion > "all required messages present" against <xsl:value-of > select="$testcase"/> message <xsl:value-of select="$num"/> > failed</sch:assert> > </sch:rule> > </xsl:if> > </xsl:if> > > This makes the IBM->Sun failure on 1251 show up and also that the > Microsoft logs need some renumbering but I don't think it throws up any > red we aren't expecting? > > I'll generate new reports against those who have asked this evening > (it's easier to do at home because of firewall issues). > > Cheers, > David > > David Illsley > Web Services Development > MP127, IBM Hursley Park, SO21 2JN > +44 (0)1962 815049 (Int. 245049) > david.illsley@uk.ibm.com > > > *"Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>* > Sent by: public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org > > 02/03/2006 14:50 > > > To > "Arun Gupta" <Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM>, "WS-Addressing Tests" > <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org> > cc > > Subject > RE: Mostly red report > > > > > > > > > > My bad, my fix for the "missing message" case caused a side effect. > Checked in a version I'm more confident in. The next rebuild will tell. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws- > > addressing-tests-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Arun Gupta > > Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 5:51 AM > > To: WS-Addressing Tests > > Subject: Mostly red report > > > > > > The report (dated Thu Mar 2 13:08:37 2006 UTC) turned from mostly > green > > to mostly red. It anybody investigating that ? > > > > -Arun > > -- > > got Web Services ? > > Download Java Web Services Developer Pack from > > http://java.sun.com/webservices > > > -- got Web Services ? Download Java Web Services Developer Pack from http://java.sun.com/webservices
Received on Thursday, 2 March 2006 17:09:45 UTC