- From: Arun Gupta <Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM>
- Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 09:11:20 -0800
- To: David Illsley <david.illsley@uk.ibm.com>
- Cc: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, WS-Addressing Tests <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>, public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org
test1147 for IBM->Sun and Microsoft->Sun is now fixed and endpoints
updated.
I dont have an easy way to test1147 and test1248 for Sun->Sun. Can that
be updated in the stylesheet to reflect that ?
I sent a separate mail about test1251 and still looking for an
explanation there before I implement it.
-Arun
David Illsley wrote:
>
> Looks better :-)
>
> ...but maybe not quite right (Microsoft -> Sun is failing 'cos of a lack
> of a message 2 in 1251 and message 2 shouldn't be required for 1251).
>
> I think the following should fix it so that only message elements in the
> testcases.xml which have associated assertions become required.
>
> In mkschema.xsl:
>
> <xsl:if test="$num!=1">
> <xsl:if
> test="count(./s:assert)>0">
>
> <sch:rule context="log:message[@testcase='{$testcase}'][@message='1']">
>
> <sch:assert
> test="following-sibling::log:message[@testcase='{$testcase}'][@message='{$num}']">assertion
> "all required messages present" against <xsl:value-of
> select="$testcase"/> message <xsl:value-of select="$num"/>
> failed</sch:assert>
> </sch:rule>
> </xsl:if>
> </xsl:if>
>
> This makes the IBM->Sun failure on 1251 show up and also that the
> Microsoft logs need some renumbering but I don't think it throws up any
> red we aren't expecting?
>
> I'll generate new reports against those who have asked this evening
> (it's easier to do at home because of firewall issues).
>
> Cheers,
> David
>
> David Illsley
> Web Services Development
> MP127, IBM Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
> +44 (0)1962 815049 (Int. 245049)
> david.illsley@uk.ibm.com
>
>
> *"Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>*
> Sent by: public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org
>
> 02/03/2006 14:50
>
>
> To
> "Arun Gupta" <Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM>, "WS-Addressing Tests"
> <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>
> cc
>
> Subject
> RE: Mostly red report
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> My bad, my fix for the "missing message" case caused a side effect.
> Checked in a version I'm more confident in. The next rebuild will tell.
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-
> > addressing-tests-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Arun Gupta
> > Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 5:51 AM
> > To: WS-Addressing Tests
> > Subject: Mostly red report
> >
> >
> > The report (dated Thu Mar 2 13:08:37 2006 UTC) turned from mostly
> green
> > to mostly red. It anybody investigating that ?
> >
> > -Arun
> > --
> > got Web Services ?
> > Download Java Web Services Developer Pack from
> > http://java.sun.com/webservices
>
>
>
--
got Web Services ?
Download Java Web Services Developer Pack from
http://java.sun.com/webservices
Received on Thursday, 2 March 2006 17:09:45 UTC