- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 09:18:39 -0800
- To: "Arun Gupta" <Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM>, "David Illsley" <david.illsley@uk.ibm.com>
- Cc: "WS-Addressing Tests" <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>, <public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org>
We just updated the results again: Added a new log from Glen running the Microsoft public client against the Axis endpoint. 51% pass, rest aren't getting enough debug information to figure out what's going on. Added 2 WSO2 logs. Tried to fix the problem of ensuring each test has the right number of messages. Still some strange behavior around 1251 on Sun though to investigate. Sun logs don't get past 1234... We will remove tests 1145 and 1245 tomorrow, per WG decisions. Also 1260 will likely be dropped or moved to INFORMATIVE. > -----Original Message----- > From: Arun Gupta [mailto:Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM] > Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 9:11 AM > To: David Illsley > Cc: Jonathan Marsh; WS-Addressing Tests; public-ws-addressing-tests- > request@w3.org > Subject: Re: Mostly red report > > test1147 for IBM->Sun and Microsoft->Sun is now fixed and endpoints > updated. > > I dont have an easy way to test1147 and test1248 for Sun->Sun. Can that > be updated in the stylesheet to reflect that ? > > I sent a separate mail about test1251 and still looking for an > explanation there before I implement it. > > -Arun > > David Illsley wrote: > > > > Looks better :-) > > > > ...but maybe not quite right (Microsoft -> Sun is failing 'cos of a lack > > of a message 2 in 1251 and message 2 shouldn't be required for 1251). > > > > I think the following should fix it so that only message elements in the > > testcases.xml which have associated assertions become required. > > > > In mkschema.xsl: > > > > <xsl:if test="$num!=1"> > > <xsl:if > > test="count(./s:assert)>0"> > > > > <sch:rule context="log:message[@testcase='{$testcase}'][@message='1']"> > > > > <sch:assert > > test="following- > sibling::log:message[@testcase='{$testcase}'][@message='{$num}']">assert io > n > > "all required messages present" against <xsl:value-of > > select="$testcase"/> message <xsl:value-of select="$num"/> > > failed</sch:assert> > > > </sch:rule> > > </xsl:if> > > </xsl:if> > > > > This makes the IBM->Sun failure on 1251 show up and also that the > > Microsoft logs need some renumbering but I don't think it throws up any > > red we aren't expecting? > > > > I'll generate new reports against those who have asked this evening > > (it's easier to do at home because of firewall issues). > > > > Cheers, > > David > > > > David Illsley > > Web Services Development > > MP127, IBM Hursley Park, SO21 2JN > > +44 (0)1962 815049 (Int. 245049) > > david.illsley@uk.ibm.com > > > > > > *"Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>* > > Sent by: public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org > > > > 02/03/2006 14:50 > > > > > > To > > "Arun Gupta" <Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM>, "WS-Addressing Tests" > > <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org> > > cc > > > > Subject > > RE: Mostly red report > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My bad, my fix for the "missing message" case caused a side effect. > > Checked in a version I'm more confident in. The next rebuild will tell. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws- > > > addressing-tests-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Arun Gupta > > > Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 5:51 AM > > > To: WS-Addressing Tests > > > Subject: Mostly red report > > > > > > > > > The report (dated Thu Mar 2 13:08:37 2006 UTC) turned from mostly > > green > > > to mostly red. It anybody investigating that ? > > > > > > -Arun > > > -- > > > got Web Services ? > > > Download Java Web Services Developer Pack from > > > http://java.sun.com/webservices > > > > > > > > -- > got Web Services ? > Download Java Web Services Developer Pack from > http://java.sun.com/webservices
Received on Thursday, 2 March 2006 17:18:55 UTC