- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 17:12:51 +0900
- To: Public Web of Things IG <public-wot-ig@w3.org>, public-wot-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAJ8iq9W1XeOX8tckineOBWZOzTdn2anYCA5G9XsB7iOoVFMBrA@mail.gmail.com>
available at: https://www.w3.org/2019/11/14-wot-marketing-minutes.html also as text below. Thanks a lot for taking the minutes, Dave! Kazuyuki --- [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ - DRAFT - WoT Marketing 14 Nov 2019 Attendees Present Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_McCool, Ege_Korkan, Daniel_Peintner, Taki_Kamiya, David_Ezell, Dave_Raggett, dsr, Ryuchi_Matsukura Regrets Sebastian_Kaebisch Chair Ege Scribe dsr Contents * [2]Topics 1. [3]Issue 19 2. [4]Issue 17 3. [5]Issue 18 4. [6]Issue 2 5. [7]Issue 19 (revisited) * [8]Summary of Action Items * [9]Summary of Resolutions __________________________________________________________ <kaz> scribenick: dsr Issue 19 <ege> [10]https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/issues/19 [10] https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/issues/19 Daniel's draft email to be sent to Coralie (head of W3C comms) This is about finding out the MarComm Team's plans and timeline for the website redesign, and sharing what we are hoping to do for the WoT pages Kaz: the website redesign work is still at a very early stage, we should collect our suggestions for the WoT IG/WG and pass them on to Coralie ... note that once we've got a consensus about the resolution, the one of the co-Chairs should send it to the W3C MarComm Team McCool: Sebastian should take the lead on that Daniel: the URI is publicly available for the website redesign RFP ... we should seek feedback on our plans rather than waiting for the website redesign to be done Kaz: one question is around what kinds of tools we should be using ... My point is purely procedural, and concerns checking with Coralie if we can continue our discussion on the public github about this point ... probably okay, but want to hear from her first ... Sebastian can send his email once we hear back from Coralie, re use of public github pages Issue 17 <inserted> [11]Issue 17 [11] https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/issues/17 Ege: we may want to have a WoT twitter account ... It is important to reach a wider audience <ege> [12]https://twitter.com/csswg [12] https://twitter.com/csswg Dave asks if Ege means an account or a hashtag Ege: I mean an account ... Open question is how to open the account, not clear which is the best way to go Daniel: we should check with CSS WG for how their account was created ... I would prefer a W3C official account Kaz: this would be managed by the W3C MarComm team first ... we can chat with the CSS group for their advice on practical aspects after talking with the MarComm Team Ege: is our contact Naomi or Coralie? Kaz: we can talk to Naomi and ask her to transfer our message to Coralie, but the Chair can send our message directly to w3t-comm list with the whole WoT IG/WG feedback Ege: I propose we bring the twitter account idea to the main call next Wednesday [no objections] Issue 18 [13]https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/issues/18 covers chronology of WoT standardisation [13] https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/issues/18 with a history of important events, e.g. publication of WD, workshops, ... for use in any web page where appropriate Ege: I would need help if we agree to move this forward Taki: I agree that this would be important Taki offers to help Ege to fill out the list of events by year Dave: we should provide a brief summary for each listed event Ege: should we close these issues and continue the discussion on the template? Daniel: we can close issue 9 Dave: my concern was what we need to do in the very short term Kaz: right. We should clarify what we want to do Ege: one example is the table on the WG page Daniel: the date of the last REC track draft is much more important than the FPWD RESOLUTION: Daniel to propose changes for W3C staff contacts to apply Dave: for the /WoT/ page we should provide a concise status for the IG/WG at the top ... I think we were requested to add the link for joining the IG on this page <kaz> kaz: +1 to add the link for joining the groups within the left column or the center column (McCool leaves Issue 2 <ege> [14]https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/issues/2 [14] https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/issues/2 <ege> [15]https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/blob/master/posts/draf t/2019-10-tpac-update.md [15] https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/blob/master/posts/draft/2019-10-tpac-update.md Dave: we should get Michael's blog on the IG page and the main W3C blog Ege asks Dave to insert the text from the TPAC update to the current IG page via WordPress admin Dave to copy the content to the W3C blog on behalf of the IG/WG Issue 19 (revisited) Daniel: is it now okay to ask Sebastian to proceed with gathering feedback to send to Coralie <Zakim> kaz, you wanted to report that Coralie is OK with siting the RFP document Kaz: yes ... we need to summarise the feedback from the whole IG/WG before sending it to MarComm Dave: this task force should prepare some material for the mail call to discuss Perhaps Ege could do this with Daniel's help? Kaz summarises the process to follow Another possibility is for the main call to approve devolving all responsibility to the marketing task force Ege: the Task force should be able to update the pages without requiring prior approval from the main call in each case Ege to propose agenda request for next Wednesday's main call, along with some supporting material [adjourned] Summary of Action Items Summary of Resolutions 1. [16]Daniel to propose changes for W3C staff contacts to apply [End of minutes] __________________________________________________________ Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by David Booth's [17]scribe.perl version 1.154 ([18]CVS log) $Date: 2019/11/15 08:09:24 $ [17] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm [18] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Friday, 15 November 2019 08:13:34 UTC