- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 02:51:44 +0900
- To: Public Web of Things IG <public-wot-ig@w3.org>, public-wot-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAJ8iq9XowWgCyHVGW_viXUqbu2ercykNzs5B=irDQXnB8aDwaQ@mail.gmail.com>
available at: https://www.w3.org/2019/11/05-wot-sec-minutes.html also as text below. Thanks a lot for taking the minutes, Elena! Kazuyuki --- [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ - DRAFT - WoT Security 05 Nov 2019 [2]Agenda [2] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/IG_Security_WebConf#Nov_5_2019 Attendees Present Kaz_Ashimura, Elena_Reshetova, Michael_McCool, Oliver_Pfaff, Taki_Kamiya, Tomoaki_Mizushima Regrets Chair McCool Scribe elena_ Contents * [3]Topics 1. [4]Quick updates 2. [5]Previous minutes 3. [6]Time slot for the Security call 4. [7]Publication status 5. [8]Privacy risks 6. [9]Issues and PRs * [10]Summary of Action Items * [11]Summary of Resolutions __________________________________________________________ <kaz> scribenick: elena_ Quick updates McCool: any quick updates? noone raised any Previous minutes McCool: any meeting minutes from last time to review? <kaz> [12]https://www.w3.org/2019/10/14-wot-sec-minutes.html [12] https://www.w3.org/2019/10/14-wot-sec-minutes.html <kaz> [13]https://www.w3.org/2019/10/21-wot-sec-minutes.html [13] https://www.w3.org/2019/10/21-wot-sec-minutes.html <McCool> [14]https://www.w3.org/2019/09/09-wot-sec-minutes.html [14] https://www.w3.org/2019/09/09-wot-sec-minutes.html minutes from september 9th are already approved McCool: 14th of October minutes looking through, no changes from my side ... any objections to accept minutes? no objections 14th of October is accepted McCool: 20th of october: any objections to accepting the minutes? no objections both meeting minutes are accepted Time slot for the Security call McCool: time choice discussion ... current slot is not optimal for everyone is it is 3am time for Canada, which does not work for me ... so we discussing to go back to our previous time on Monday ... elena will resolve the problem and we can go back to slot 9pm on Japan time ... does anyone has objections to the 9pm slot on Monday for security call? no objections raised McCool: starting next week we have a call on Mondays at 10pm Japan time <kaz> ACTION: kaz to allocate a new webex for wot-security on Monday at 8an EST (10pm JST) Publication status McCool: next publication status. Kaz: there are still several minor errors ... PR from Michael is merged <kaz> [15]Master branch Editor's draft [15] https://w3c.github.io/wot-security/ <kaz> [16]updated Note3 version generated from the Master branch Editor's draft [16] https://w3c.github.io/wot-security/releases/note3/Overview.html <kaz> [17]Pubrules checker results [17] https://www.w3.org/pubrules/?url=https://w3c.github.io/wot-security/releases/note3/Overview.html&profile=WG-NOTE-Echidna&validation=simple-validation&noRecTrack=true&informativeOnly=true&echidnaReady=true&patentPolicy=pp2004 McCool: let's look at the current state Kaz: current master version has several errors with the Pubruels Checker, needs fixing McCool: changes that I did recently - deleted summary and added change log ... in changelog I talk about name change and made summary for all the diffs, including from second and first version ... also made few minor tweaks ... changed to use references for WoT Architecture and WoT TD from hyperlinks Kaz: need to fix errors including these references ... we should check the pubrules checker results looking at errors 3 errors displayed <kaz> [18]Pubrules results again [18] https://www.w3.org/pubrules/?url=https://w3c.github.io/wot-security/releases/note3/Overview.html&profile=WG-NOTE-Echidna&validation=simple-validation&noRecTrack=true&informativeOnly=true&echidnaReady=true&patentPolicy=pp2004 also looking at the warnings McCool: let's fix the errors Kaz: given that both WoT Architecture and WoT TD refer to WoT Security and Privacy Guidelines, the latter one should be either published first or on the same day McCool: let's do the mandatory fixes now ... they should be easy fixes McCool is actually doing fixes McCool: is best practice document published? Kaz: no, and it is ok to refer to it by URL McCool fixing duplicate id referral McCool commits the changes to master branch McCool: kaz should get it finalized and published now ... we need to clean up Editors notes in the doc also <kaz> [the draft on the master branch has been updated :) ] Privacy risks McCool: looking at the EN on Links ... associated with the dereferencing risk ... section on privacy needs improvements and updates, also associated with identifiers with unique cryptographic identifiers McCool: let's create an issue for updating this section <McCool> [19]https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/140 [19] https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/140 Issues and PRs McCool: let's look at issues and PRs ... we should also cleanup our references <inserted> [20]PR 137 [20] https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/pull/137 looking at PR 137 <inserted> [21]Issue 123 [21] https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/123 McCool: this relates to issue 123 ... about mixing gateway and proxy terminology ... we have other places where we use proxy, so we should not make the change for just this one place, because it adds inconsistency ... we should just explain that proxy is one of the special cases of the intermediary Taki: makes sense McCool: should we add a sentence now before the final publication is done or do it after? Kaz: first priority is to publish as soon as possible McCool: so let's close this PR for now, but in the future (after publication is done) to add a sentence explaining proxy terminology ... let's add an issue to record this action <kaz> [22]new Issue 141 for that [22] https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/141 issue 141 created McCool: we should go and close some old issues <kaz> [23]Issue 134 [23] https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/134 looking at issue 134 McCool: any objections to close this issue? McCool closing it McCool: we should close the issues next time ... if new participants, including Oliver could try to go review the document Oliver: what is the preferred way of reporting issues? McCool: if it is typo, just create PR, if it is a bigger issue, create an issue ... we are out of time, any other business? ... we are proceeding with the publication now meeting finished <kaz> [adjourned] Summary of Action Items [NEW] ACTION: kaz to allocate a new webex for wot-security on Monday at 8an EST (10pm JST) Summary of Resolutions [End of minutes] __________________________________________________________ Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by David Booth's [24]scribe.perl version 1.154 ([25]CVS log) $Date: 2019/11/18 17:50:28 $ [24] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm [25] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Monday, 18 November 2019 17:52:29 UTC