[online][PlugFest/Testing] minutes - 18 June 2020

available at:
  https://www.w3.org/2020/06/18-wot-pf-minutes.html

also as tet below.

Thanks a lot for taking the minutes, Ege!

Kazuyuki

---
   [1]W3C

      [1] http://www.w3.org/

                               - DRAFT -

                            PlugFest/Testing

18 Jun 2020

   [2]Agenda

      [2] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/PlugFest_WebConf#Agenda_06.18.2020

Attendees

   Present
          Kaz_Ashimura, Ege_Korkan, Farshid_Tavakolizadeh,
          Kunihiko_Toumura, Michael_Lagally, Michael_McCool,
          Miguel_Romero, Ryuichi_Matsukura, Tomoaki_Mizushima,
          Michael_Koster, Daniel_Peintner, Sebastian_Kaebisch,
          David_Ezell

   Regrets

   Chair
          McCool

   Scribe
          Ege, kaz

Contents

     * [3]Topics
         1. [4]PR 27
         2. [5]PR 16
         3. [6]LinkSmart directory population
         4. [7]Introducing WADE
         5. [8]Next steps
     * [9]Summary of Action Items
     * [10]Summary of Resolutions
     __________________________________________________________

PR 27

   [11]PR 27 -nodegen population scripts

     [11] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/pull/27

   scribenick: kaz

   McCool Nodegen population script

   scribenick: Ege

   McCool: This creates nodes in Node-RED based on the TDs of the
   repo

   scribenick: kaz

   McCool: Toumura-san, can you capture the screen, etc.?

   Toumura: would put that tomorrow

   scribenick: Ege

   Ege: would be nice to watch the repo and generate nodes
   automatically

   McCool: merging this PR

PR 16

   [12]PR 16 - validation scripts

     [12] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/pull/16

   McCool: I am working on the validation scripts but I decided to
   separate the implementation report

   McCool: not having id also causes a problem on documenting the
   validation results

   <kaz> [13]validate.sh on McCool's repo

     [13] https://github.com/mmccool/wot-testing/blob/update-validation/events/2020.06.Online/data/validate.sh

   <inserted> scribenick: kaz

   McCool: seems there is a bug

   Ege: can you open an issue about that?

   McCool: will do

   Ege: choose manual or not to be done by the playground?

   McCool: if you go to the AssertionTester...

   [14]AssertionTester

     [14] https://github.com/thingweb/thingweb-playground/tree/master/AssertionTester

   <inserted> scribenick: Ege

   McCool: almost ready to merge this PR 16

   <inserted> scribenick: kaz

   McCool: need to see the possible impacts to the other PRs

   <inserted> scribenick: Ege

   McCool: Once PR 16 is merged, some files will be moved around
   ... so it can break other PRs
   ... you can use the manual.csv as a template

   Kaz: Until when should the other participants fill the csv
   file? Also we need to copy the manual on how to do that from
   the previous page to this page.

   McCool: Yes, I would like other participants to fill this

   <inserted> scribenick: kaz

   Kaz: ok, in that case, let's ask all the participants here to
   provide CSVs as well as TDs by tomorrow

   McCool: yes

LinkSmart directory population

   <inserted> scribenick: Ege

   McCool: Directory population, any progress on this

   Farshid: Yes, I have fixed some small things
   ... should I put it in the testing repository?

   <kaz> [15]SmartLink repo (in sync with the wot-testing repo)

     [15] https://github.com/farshidtz/wot-testing-directory-sync

   <McCool>
   [16]https://github.com/mmccool/wot-testing/tree/update-validati
   on/tools

     [16] https://github.com/mmccool/wot-testing/tree/update-validation/tools

   <inserted> scribenick: kaz

   (farshid will create an issue on the wot-testing repo about his
   findings)

   McCool: note that for the implementation report, the count is
   based on the same code-basis
   ... though one company may provide more than one TD
   ... Toumura-san, do you think you could do the demo on nodegen
   population tomorrow?
   ... would be great if it's possible

   Toumura: will try

Introducing WADE

   <Ege> [17]https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/tree/master/tools
   WADE tool

     [17] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/tree/master/tools

   <Ege> [18]https://github.com/tum-esi/wade

     [18] https://github.com/tum-esi/wade

   Ege: works with the TDs
   ... you can paste TDs directly
   ... or load them
   ... and then specify protocols
   ... then choose, properties, actions events
   ... and get results on the right side
   ... some TD like Oracle's blue pump requires additional
   credentials
   ... you can use CoAP as well
   ... (choose "TUM-CoAP16")
   ... can see the response time as well

   [19]WADE repo on the TUM side

     [19] https://github.com/tum-esi/wade

   Kaz: what is the "results" here?

   Ege: the WADE tool is a consumer and processed the TD

   Kaz: ok
   ... and the turn-around time is calculated based on the clock
   on the client side?

   Ege: right

   McCool: question about the random string
   ... would be good for actual usage too

   Miguel: (shows W-ADE Tests for all non-VPN Things)
   ... actions don't work for the Oracle devices

   Lagally:: what do you mean by "don't work" here?

   Miguel: can get properties
   ... but when try actions, e.g., value: true
   ... get an error

   Kaz: caused by the authentication level?

   Lagally:: yeah

   Daniel: I also tried to connect with the Oracle devices, but
   got no errors...

   Lagally:: we should check what's happening a bit more

   Ege: might need some more work for WADE

   Kaz: yeah, let's look into the details and clarify what is the
   cause
   ... maybe a bug of WADE but might be some issue with network
   configuration or the device side

   Miguel: (shows the TUM coffee machine next)

   McCool: you can capture your screenshot for the description

   Miguel: ok

Next steps

   McCool: start to think of outcomes
   ... would say it would be great to have screen captures
   ... and also you can create an issue about your finding

   Kaz: people should record not only the "success" side but also
   the "failure" side :)

   McCool: right, the problem findings are useful
   ... it would be nice to have issues captured for further
   discussions
   ... and then any plans in your mind?
   ... e.g., interoperability data file
   ... maybe the node-red stuff
   ... Toumura-san, maybe you might want to collect
   interoperability tests as well
   ... and reflect the results to nodegen.csv

   <McCool>
   [20]https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/tree/master/events/2020.
   06.Online/data/interop

     [20] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/tree/master/events/2020.06.Online/data/interop

   McCool: TUM guys are also encouraged to work on WADE for that
   purpose
   ... hope we can capture some data for interoperability as well
   ... btw, wondering about the AWS VPN service
   ... possible to continue to use it for a while?

   Kaz: let me check with the W3C System Team

   McCool: ok
   ... (checking the network configuration diagram)

   [21]diagram on README.md

     [21] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/blob/master/events/2020.06.Online/README.md

   McCool: tx for maintaining it, Toumura-san
   ... let's continue the discussion tomorrow!

   [adjourned]

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

   [End of minutes]
     __________________________________________________________


    Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
    David Booth's [22]scribe.perl version ([23]CVS log)
    $Date: 2020/06/18 14:55:33 $

     [22] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
     [23] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/

Received on Friday, 24 July 2020 12:46:19 UTC