W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wot-ig@w3.org > September 2015

Re: Inviting OneM2M to present current status and plans?

From: Soumya Kanti Datta <Soumya-Kanti.Datta@eurecom.fr>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 16:38:02 +0530
To: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>, "Heuer, Joerg" <joerg.heuer@siemens.com>
Cc: Public Web of Things IG <public-wot-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <55E97B92.4000406@eurecom.fr>
Dave, Joerg

I'd support this idea of inviting oneM2M into our meetings. oneM2M is 
not only aligned in terms of discovery and interop but also working 
significantly on enabling semantics for M2M/IoT. That could be another 
point of joint discussion. I am very much aware of what they are doing 
at this point and would further support liaising with them in near future.

Just a small point - in 
- you might think of just putting oneM2M instead of "ETSI and oneM2M" 
since oneM2M partnership project includes ETSI.


Research Engineer, Eurecom, France | +33658194342 | @skdatta2010
https://sites.google.com/site/skdunfolded | Skype id: soumyakantidatta

On 04-09-2015 16:20, Dave Raggett wrote:
> Hi Joerg,
> I had a call today with representatives of OneM2M, and would like to 
> invite them to a future WoT IG teleconference to present their current 
> status and plans.  This would be in October or later.  From our 
> discussions, it appears that W3C and OneM2M are aligned at a high 
> level in respect to the potential role of metadata as a basis for 
> discovery and interoperability.  It therefore seems reasonable to ask 
> what it would mean for the Web of Things to interoperate with M2M.
> Given that this crosses the boundaries of the WoT IG task forces, it 
> could make sense to have them present in a WoT IG plenary call.
> p.s. my contact point for this is Omar Elloumi.
> Best regards,
> —
>    Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org <mailto:dsr@w3.org>>
Received on Friday, 4 September 2015 11:07:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:26:45 UTC