- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 07:19:03 -0400
- To: ext Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- CC: public-widgets-pag@w3.org
Doug - what is the name and e-mail address of the person who sent you the e-mail below? -Thanks, Art Barstow On 7/19/11 1:04 AM, ext Doug Schepers wrote: > Forwarding on from original email sent to me offlist... if anyone > wants to follow up, I can contact the original poster. > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: prior art on Patent 7,743,336 > Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 09:38:15 +0200 > > Hello Doug, > > unfortunately I currently do not have the time, to really go through the > patents and the current PAG proposal in detail, but from a first look it > looks very closely related to the SymbianOS (formerly EPOC32) Security > Model. Those where introduced in SymbianOS v9.0 and definitely were used > before the mentioned patents were submitted. > > Thus, they might potentially qualify as prior art. You can probably find > extensive documentation on that on the forum.nokia.com webpage (since > Symbian does not exist anymore). > > The only thing that I can see that is missing is the "hash-validation > send over the internet" but that is quite common practice for > guaranteeing the integrity of downloaded packages (PGP/GPG, Maven, ...). > Internally Symbian is making use of the Hash validation for validating > the integrity of applications installed on external media (SD-cards, > Memory-stick, ...), since they could be manipulated outside the control > of the OS. > > I have been working for Symbian and UIQ for many years, so have detailed > knowledge of how the SymbianOS Security Model works. So if you have any > questions about it, feel free to ask me. > > >
Received on Tuesday, 13 September 2011 11:19:14 UTC