W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wicg@w3.org > March 2023

Re: [EXTERNAL] Updated site wicg.io

From: Tom Jones <thomasclinganjones@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 09:03:16 -0800
Message-ID: <CAK2Cwb46MZYDGK-3nOheusy-kCSZEX3oM2h23pxCOLSOQh=G1g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Marcos Caceres <caceres_m@apple.com>
Cc: Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com>, Alex Russell <alexrussell@microsoft.com>, "public-wicg@w3.org" <public-wicg@w3.org>
Minor editorial comment. The list is in activity order. Not being
familiar with most of the incubations, I cannot tell if they are ordered
left to right or top to bottom.

I will consider filing bugs against unsafe features after discussion within
my team. I would suggest that AI attacks be part of any security notations.


On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 5:22 PM Marcos Caceres <caceres_m@apple.com> wrote:

> Hi Tom,
> > On 8 Mar 2023, at 9:01 am, Tom Jones <thomasclinganjones@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I work on an incubating fork and expect that there will be some of the
> features that are not allowed as they are considered not safe. That process
> is likely to accelerate.
> Right, however, we are conversely interested in listing shipping
> incubations. If you've are experimenting with any incubations and have left
> some pref’ed on, then please let us know so we can list your fork’s name as
> “shipping-your-forks-name-here".
> On the other hand, for cases where you’ve removed incubations from
> Chromium it would be super helpful if you could file bugs explaining why
> you made that decision. Understanding why you felt an incubation is unsafe
> is extremely valuable input to the incubation process!
> Thanks in advance and really looking forward to your input!
> Marcos
Received on Thursday, 9 March 2023 17:03:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 9 March 2023 17:03:42 UTC