W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wicg@w3.org > March 2023

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Updated site wicg.io

From: Alex Russell <alexrussell@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 21:51:46 +0000
To: Marcos Caceres <caceres_m@apple.com>, Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com>
CC: "public-wicg@w3.org" <public-wicg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <DM5PR00MB03427302553B3B669E4E4EBDB3B79@DM5PR00MB0342.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
If we're iterating on this UI, perhaps it would also be helpful for web developers to understand which incubations are actively soliciting feedback and which are shipped in one (or more) engines, and the fraction of browsing that supports and incubated feature? caniuse data slices by this pretty well.


From: Marcos Caceres <caceres_m@apple.com>
Sent: 07 March 2023 10:52
To: Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com>
Cc: public-wicg@w3.org <public-wicg@w3.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Updated site wicg.io

Hi Tom!

> On 7 Mar 2023, at 2:33 am, Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com> wrote:
> Thanks for working on this! Would there be a way to separate archived into abandoned and progressed?
> Maybe by introducing a label or something?

Coincidently, we are trying to come up with the labels for the various stages things are at:

Would love to get your input there! The discussion is a little spicy 🌶️ but I think we are making good progress.

We should then be able to hijack the repo “topics” strings and get those exposed to the site via the Github API.

> For example, uuid was successfully promoted, but the work on virtual-scroller truly stopped.

Right, we call “promoted” -> “graduated”. I filed a bug so we can create a JSON file for those:

Received on Tuesday, 7 March 2023 21:57:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 7 March 2023 21:57:36 UTC