- From: Andrea Rendine <master.skywalker.88@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 16:15:21 +0100
- To: WHATWG List <whatwg@whatwg.org>
..Simon, there's no use case where <meta> cannot be substituted by a JS-only solution. The point is, what happens to the JS-only solution in cases where JS is not usable for any reason? Usually fallback content can be hidden or removed somehow, but <meta> makes it impossible. Does this mean that meta refresh should be avoided altogether and replaced by JS? 2015-03-26 14:48 GMT+01:00 Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>: > On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 14:37:17 +0100, Andrea Rendine < > master.skywalker.88@gmail.com> wrote: > > Some fellow people who want to stop the power of <meta>, then. (the first >> 2 >> questions for sure, and even more below) >> > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/28435865/can-i-stop- > a-meta-refresh-using-javascript > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16289798/button-to- > temporarily-disable-stop-meta-tag-refresh > > These can be solved with JS-only refresh, as far as I can tell. > > Any others? > > > -- > Simon Pieters > Opera Software >
Received on Thursday, 26 March 2015 15:15:48 UTC