- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 16:29:15 +0100
- To: "WHATWG List" <whatwg@whatwg.org>, "Andrea Rendine" <master.skywalker.88@gmail.com>
On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 16:15:21 +0100, Andrea Rendine <master.skywalker.88@gmail.com> wrote: > ..Simon, there's no use case where <meta> cannot be substituted by a > JS-only solution. The point is, what happens to the JS-only solution in > cases where JS is not usable for any reason? A JS-only solution does not address use cases where you want to fallback to <meta> when JS is enabled but still fails to run. I didn't see that being a requirement in the stackoverflow threads. -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Thursday, 26 March 2015 15:29:56 UTC