- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 16:11:52 +0100
- To: Majid Valipour <majidvp@google.com>
- Cc: WHATWG <whatwg@whatwg.org>, Majid Valipour <majidvp@chromium.org>, Rick Byers <rbyers@chromium.org>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, japhet@chromium.org
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Majid Valipour <majidvp@google.com> wrote: > That is fair. Assuming clear documentation helps alleviate potential > confusion I am fine with deprecation route. I suppose the purpose of the > spec is to not only document the current recommended behavior but also > capture any legacy ones until it is fully removed. Yeah, we don't want any new user agents such as Spartan or Servo run into pages that only work with history.replaceState(). They'd then have to reverse engineer it rather than simply reading a specification which is not nice. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 26 March 2015 15:12:39 UTC