- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 07:09:53 +0100
- To: Majid Valipour <majidvp@google.com>
- Cc: WHATWG <whatwg@whatwg.org>, Majid Valipour <majidvp@chromium.org>, Rick Byers <rbyers@chromium.org>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, japhet@chromium.org
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 1:22 AM, Majid Valipour <majidvp@google.com> wrote: > My only concern is to make sure that these new methods replace > history.pushState() and history.replaceState() in the spec. Otherwise I feel > the benefits of a cleaner API is not worth the additional confusion of > having different methods for doing (almost) the same thing. Well, I doubt that they can, maybe over a very long period of time but I wouldn't count on it. However, if MDN describes them as more capable methods (and without the useless second argument), I doubt there will be much confusion. Having four required arguments is no picnic either. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 26 March 2015 06:10:19 UTC