- From: Bobby Mozumder <mozumder@futureclaw.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 15:18:15 -0400
- To: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
> On Apr 2, 2015, at 4:23 AM, Rimantas Liubertas <rimantas@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I gave a limited one-page idea for now, so design faults should be obvious. This will take years, but right now it’s looking like there aren’t fundamental problems with the proposal. > > There are fundamental problems with your proposal, namely: > 1) it relies on some undefined magic I believe that’s called “programming”. > 2) it changes HTML to something entirely different. To what? HTML already has things like <SCRIPT> and other features not related to hypertext markup. Besides, where’s the rule that say “HTML needs to only be this..” ? Artificial constraints are unnecessary. > 3) you assume that those not willing to learn Javascript will somehow know how to use the features you propose without learning. How? They use HTML, which is far more widespread than Javascript. There’s a reason this proposal has gone viral outside of this list. -bobby --- Bobby Mozumder Editor-in-Chief FutureClaw Magazine mozumder@futureclaw.com <mailto:mozumder@futureclaw.com> +1-240-745-5287 www.futureclaw.com <http://www.futureclaw.com/> twitter.com/futureclaw <https://www.twitter.com/futureclaw> www.linkedin.com/in/mozumder <http://www.linkedin.com/in/mozumder>
Received on Thursday, 2 April 2015 19:18:46 UTC