- From: Nils Dagsson Moskopp <nils@dieweltistgarnichtso.net>
- Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 20:17:39 +0100
- To: Tobie Langel <tobie.langel@gmail.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: whatwg <whatwg@whatwg.org>, Brett Zamir <brettz9@yahoo.com>
Tobie Langel <tobie.langel@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > >> On Sat, 15 Feb 2014, Brett Zamir wrote: >> > >> > The desktop PC thankfully evolved into allowing third-party software >> > which could create and edit files shareable by other third-party >> > software which would have the same rights to do the same. The importance >> > of this can hardly be overestimated. >> > >> > Yet today, on the web, there appears to be no standard way to create >> > content in such an agnostic manner whereby users have full, built-in, >> > locally-controlled portability of their data. >> >> Why can't you just do the same as used to be done? Download the resource >> locally ("save", using <a href download>), then upload it to the new site >> ("open", using <input type=file>)? >> > > Because that's a terrible user experience? If that is indeed the case, the terrible user experience is likely a feature of your user agent. Many mobile UAs currently offer several alternatives to the standard file-picker, no change in HTML needed. -- Nils Dagsson Moskopp // erlehmann <http://dieweltistgarnichtso.net>
Received on Tuesday, 28 October 2014 19:18:23 UTC