Re: [whatwg] Notifications and service workers

On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Jonas Sicking <> wrote:
> I don't know of a use-case for that. And given that I think we should
> define that non-persistent notifications go away after a timeout, I
> think this is the common scenario.
> The reason I think we should use timeouts is that this matches all
> OS-native non-persistent notifications that I know of, and also seems
> like a better UX.

I started to remove the close event and then I noticed we also use it
when a notification gets replaced by a newer one. Do we care about


Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2014 14:14:16 UTC