- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 18:42:24 +0100
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>, WHATWG <whatwg@whatwg.org>
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 6:35 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > I also think it should be (B), since the meaning of the coordinates > in the imagemap shouldn't change as a result of CSS styling of the > image. Note that as Daniel pointed out it for legacy reasons already does. <img height/width> and CSS height/width are the same. Not perpetuating that further makes sense though. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 7 November 2014 17:42:52 UTC