- From: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 08:11:40 -0700
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Cc: Joshua Peek <josh@joshpeek.com>, WHATWG <whatwg@whatwg.org>
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 3:15 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 6:10 AM, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com> wrote: >> I haven't been following the fetch API in detail. Is there some >> collective understanding of what abstraction layer fetch represents? > > It's at the same level as XMLHttpRequest. XMLHttpRequest isn't particularly cleanly layered. It's sounds like you're not overly concerned about layering, which is probably fine. Adam >> For example, I could imagine that we might not want to add a >> dependency from the fetch to the HTML parser because fetch is a lower >> layer of the system. > > The API in question would be on the FetchBodyStream returned from the > network. Adding asHTML there wouldn't pose any requirements on the > underlying Fetch system. > > However, I think we should wait with adding more as* APIs until we > have some experience with the current set of features. > > > -- > http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 23 June 2014 15:12:42 UTC