W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > June 2014

Re: [whatwg] Proposal: toDataURL “image/png” compression control

From: Justin Novosad <junov@google.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 13:05:03 -0400
Message-ID: <CABpaAqTPssChB2Sx29Dh=ge_JFXfSAw6YrQx35sH6TghwaW_NQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>
Cc: whatwg <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>, Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>, Nils Dagsson Moskopp <nils@dieweltistgarnichtso.net>
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>

> On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 3:44 AM, Justin Novosad <junov@google.com> wrote:
>> My point is, we need a proper litmus test for the "just do it in script"
>> argument because, let's be honnest, a lot of new features being added to
>> the Web platform could be scripted efficiently, and that does not
>> necessarily make them bad features.
> Which ones?

The examples I had in mind when I wrote that were Path2D and HitRegions.

> Rob
> --
> Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
> le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
> stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
> 'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
> waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w
Received on Monday, 2 June 2014 17:05:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 17:00:21 UTC