W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > January 2014

Re: [whatwg] Adding obsolete elements/attributes to indexes

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 16:54:14 +0000 (UTC)
To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1401231648070.29201@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
Cc: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014, Simon Sapin wrote:
> To help with "discoverability" of obsolete features by implementers, IĘd 
> like them to be included in the Index sectionĘs tables.

They're explicitly excluded to help with avoiding their discovery by 

There's a link from any interface that has obsolete IDL members to the 
partial interface that defines those members. As far as non-obsolete 
elements go, I think the only requirements in the obsolete section are 
regarding these obsolete IDL members.

> When considering what Servo should implement, I mistakenly concluded 
> that <li> elements do not have a 'type' attribute, based on the Index. 
> They in fact do, as specified in the Obsolete features section.

Do you mean a type IDL attribute or a type content attribute? No IDL 
attributes are listed in the index. I don't know what it really means for 
an element to have a content attribute, from an implement's persective.

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 23 January 2014 16:54:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 17:00:15 UTC