- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 09:00:31 -0800
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
On 23/01/2014 08:54, Ian Hickson wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jan 2014, Simon Sapin wrote: >> >> To help with "discoverability" of obsolete features by implementers, I¢d >> like them to be included in the Index section¢s tables. > > They're explicitly excluded to help with avoiding their discovery by > authors. I see. I still wish there was a version of the indexes for implementers :) > There's a link from any interface that has obsolete IDL members to the > partial interface that defines those members. As far as non-obsolete > elements go, I think the only requirements in the obsolete section are > regarding these obsolete IDL members. > > >> When considering what Servo should implement, I mistakenly concluded >> that <li> elements do not have a 'type' attribute, based on the Index. >> They in fact do, as specified in the Obsolete features section. > > Do you mean a type IDL attribute or a type content attribute? No IDL > attributes are listed in the index. I don't know what it really means for > an element to have a content attribute, from an implement's persective. I¢m talking about HTML attributes. In this case <li type=A>Foo</i> affecting rendering compared to just <li>Foo</li>. Perhaps "elements having an attribute" is not the right term, but "a content attribute having meaning for the UA"? -- Simon Sapin
Received on Thursday, 23 January 2014 17:01:14 UTC