- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2014 04:11:20 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: whatwg <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>
On Sat, 5 Apr 2014, Steve Faulkner wrote: > > The <summary> itself is not interactive, so only the triangle provides > the actionable control. The spec doesn't disallow making clicks on (non-interactive) parts of the summary defer to the disclosure triangle. Browsers should just match platform conventions, where applicable, and otherwise make whatever is considered the best choice for users (such as making such content also trigger the disclosure triangle). > Given that what we want to provide for the use case of having controls > inside the summary, after discussion around the issue, I have proposed > the following: > > <details> > <summary id=x> <label for=x>Foo</label> </summary> > ... > </details> That's way more complicated than necessary for authors, not to mention all the problems it would cause with the existing <label> definitions. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Sunday, 6 April 2014 04:11:46 UTC